Resistance Training for the Ultra-endurance Athlete

National Academy of Sports Medicine
National Academy of Sports Medicine
| Stay Updated with NASM!

By Brian Sutton MS, MA, PES, CES, NASM-CPT

It is fairly common for ultra-endurance athletes (i.e. trail runners, Ironman distance triathletes, etc.) to avoid resistance training as part of their in-season training program. If the athlete does any resistance training then it is at a very low intensity and volume, typically avoiding the legs because "my legs get enough work in my training". But does the research support this theory?  Is resistance training advantageous or harmful for the ultra-endurance athlete?

Ultra-endurance events such as the Ironman require a tremendous amount of drive and determination. In addition to mental toughness, endurance athletes require high levels of cardiorespiratory and muscular endurance. An efficient cardiorespiratory system will improve peak oxygen uptake, stroke volume, and overall cardiac output. Collectively, this enables the heart to pump more blood to working tissues supplying them with oxygen and nutrients. A healthy neuromuscular system will help ensure proper strength, muscular endurance, and rate of force production (power). In order to improve both performance aspects a combination of aerobic and resistance training activities may be the best approach. Unfortunately, many endurance athletes tend to avoid resistance training out of fear it may hamper their VO2max or result in unwanted muscle hypertrophy (bigger muscles) and weight gain. However, research does not support the claim that resistance training will hamper endurance performance if performed in a systematic and periodized fashion.

There is convincing evidence that resistance training does not improve VO2max or Lactate Threshold for previously trained endurance athletes because the aerobic duration and intensity is too low (1,2). However, resistance training may improve running economy. According to Jung, VO2max is not compromised when resistance training is added to an endurance program (1). Additionally, running economy has been shown to improve as much as eight percent following a resistance training program, which may have a large impact given the extremes endured during ultra-endurance events (1). However, there is still much debate how resistance training actually improves running economy. Some experts speculate it is caused by improved neuromuscular efficiency (coordinated movement) and force production.

In addition to improving neuromuscular efficiency, explosive resistance training has been shown to improve anaerobic power output for endurance athletes. A study performed by Mikkola et al., demonstrated a simultaneous explosive resistance training and endurance program improved power output of the quadriceps muscles for cross country skiers (3). Additionally, the subjects did not demonstrate a reduction in V02max even though endurance training was reduced by 20%. This is significant for endurance athletes who must demonstrate anaerobic capabilities such as a sprint to the finish line.

According to Saunders et al., heavy weight training and plyometrics improves the ability of muscles to utilize more elastic energy and reduce the amount of energy wasted in braking forces. By enhancing the stretch-shortening cycle, and limiting braking forces, resistance training has the potential to improve running economy (4).

Similarly, a study by Millet et al., heavy resistance training led to improved maximal strength and running economy with no significant effects on V02max for triathletes (5).

Given the evidence, endurance athletes may benefit by incorporating a resistance training program into their overall workout regimen. Resistance training and plyometrics has been shown to improve running economy, reduce braking forces, and enhance power without negatively effecting VO2max. Given these advantages, an integrated training program (as seen in NASM’s Optimum Performance Training™ model) blending resistance, plyometric, and cardiorespiratory exercises may hold the key to enhanced performance for elite endurance athletes.


1. Jung AP. The impact of resistance training on distance running performance. Sports Med. 2003;33(7):539-552.

2. Knuttgen HG. Strength training and aerobic exercise: Comparison and contrast. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):973-978. 10.1519/R-505011.1.

3. Mikkola JS, Rusko HK, Nummela AT, Paavolainen LM, Hakkinen K. Concurrent endurance and explosive type strength training increases activation and fast force production of leg extensor muscles in endurance athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(2):613-620. 10.1519/R-20045.1.

4. Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):465-485.

5. Millet GP, Jaouen B, Borrani F, Candau R. Effects of concurrent endurance and strength training on running economy and .VO(2) kinetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(8):1351-1359.

The Author

National Academy of Sports Medicine

National Academy of Sports Medicine

Since 1987 the National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) has been the global leader in delivering evidence-based certifications and advanced specializations to health and fitness professionals. Our products and services are scientifically and clinically proven. They are revered and utilized by leading brands and programs around the world and have launched thousands of successful careers.


Start Your Fitness Career Today

Become A Top-Notch Certified Personal Trainer

A NASM advisor will contact you to help you get started.

Get Started